^{Cardi B WAP Performance Video Clip}

_{I chose not to post the video above and you will see why, but I thought it was vital for the topic at hand. I will leave the link here. This video is of a typical WAP performance, by Cardi B and Meagan Thee Stallion. A song that has won various music awards. Please do not watch it if you struggle with pornography, explicit images or are abstaining for spiritual reasons:}

Gayle King: ” I’ve got a girl crush on Cardi B”

^{*70 year old Gayle King says she has a girl crush on 33 year old Cardi B and we are supposed to think what exactly? Do you see the great hypocrisy these people live in all day, everyday? But they will preach to people and destroy people from their soapbox all day long about what they believe is appropriate.}

The Bible says this; “You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye”.

Matthew 7:5

Jesus warns against judging others when you have bigger faults of your own.

Matthew 7:3-5:

Jesus compares hypocrites to “whitewashed tombs” that look beautiful on the outside but are unclean inside.

Matthew 23:27-28

First, let me say that I really didn’t like having to post these images or even address this but it seems like there is always someone saying something shockingly false or insane about Robert that shouldn’t need clarifying, but without clarification I believe that delusions and slander grow and truth and reality disappear for good.

I’m just going to get right into this and keep it to the point today because I want as many people as possible to understand this topic, read this article, and engage with what I’m saying. I have been accused by some haters of being lofty, so I’ll try to keep this as direct as possible.

Most people can probably tell what I’m about to dive into by now. If you are a music fan and connected to popular culture, you will know the reference to the example I have chosen.

Gayle King, to me, is one of the worst interviewers I have seen in a long time. I’m not sure why she continues to be given interviews with celebrities who are experiencing loss, hardship, or extreme challenges because, in my view, she lacks the empathy, morality, and common sense to conduct the interviews she does at her level.

Robert’s interview with her was just catastrophic. Not because of him, but because of her pre-planned and recorded ambush, which Robert had been warned about. But he trusted God and decided to do it regardless.

I almost can’t stand to have an algorithm recommend one of her interviews to me because I just know she is going to try to ruin someone covertly or use that person for her own gain.

Recently, she spoke out publicly against Hayden Panettiere’s mother when no one at all asked for her cold and senseless view. A woman was grieving the loss of her second child. The dirt had not even settled on Hayden’s grave when Gayle King implied that Hayden was a victim of her mother and that her mother should be ashamed.

That completely disregards the fact that Hayden, and Hayden alone, chose to take drugs. Countless parents—good, bad, and even evil—have children who have struggled with addiction all their lives, and some have lost that battle. Even AA tells enrolled addicts that they must take full responsibility for their addiction or it will not stop, and that they cannot continue to play the victim.

But Gayle King loves to make victims of everyone, especially women. It’s becoming such a problem that, in my view, she is incredibly harmful culturally and socially to women and men who listen to and admire her. Which brings me to my topic today.

I think one of the greatest evils today is hypocrisy.

Had Gayle King never tried to crucify my love and heart, Robert, on camera, and had Megan Thee Stallion not written in “Hiss,” “I can never be judged by a bitch that was dancin’, makin’ R. Kelly go viral,” or Cardi B not referred to Robert by the P-word, I would not have directed this directly at some of the biggest hypocrites in our culture today.

The women who claim to be victims and claim to be the biggest advocates for women are, in my view, sometimes the biggest hypocrites in culture—the ones taking women to a dark place we have never been before as a gender. To a place of extreme, accepted, explicit pornography, objectification and exploitation.

On top of that, Children everywhere are at risk of being spiritually, morally, and psychologically harmed by what they promote but they claim victim-hood and heroism for the sake of children. When children are often exploited because they are exposed to sexual suggestion and pornographic images and music too early on. They don’t know or understand what sex is and when it is safe. When and if they see images and music filled with women objectifying themselves in sexually explicit positions or hear the lyrics of a song like WAP, nothing in this world can give them back their innocence after that.

Robert’s music, by comparison, is suggestive and sensual, but it is clearly directed toward adult couples and the idea of lovemaking. That is completely different from a song explicitly centered around female sexual discharge. I know which songs I would rather catch my child singing from exposure somewhere. His most sensual music was written at a time when we had no social media, or limited social media. Where children would never have access to it without a parent. Unlike today where children unsupervised can easily get onto YouTube, TikTok, Facebook etc. and view a WAP performance from anywhere in the world.

Maybe people could argue that Robert’s performances in the past have been too sexual and sensual and can also be accessed now by children on social media. But almost all of those clips came from someone uploading one of his adult themed concerts not from a public performance or program viewed by families. There is a clear difference even in the extent of the lyrics Robert writes. He always says “Keep it classy.” But there is nothing classy about WAP and many other topics both Cardi B and Meagan The Stallion rap about. With young women the target of most of their music. You can’t get more explicit or pornographic than WAP.

“Wh- in this house
There’s some wh- in this house
There’s some wh- in this house
There’s some wh- in this house (hol’ up)
I said certified freak, seven days a week
Wet and gushy, make that pull-out game weak, woo (ah)

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Yeah, you dealin’ with some wet and gushy
Bring a bucket and a mop for this wet and gushy
Give me everything you got for this wet and gushy

Beat it up, baby, catch a charge
Extra large and extra hard
Put this cookie right in yo’ face
Swipe your nose like a credit card
Hop on top, I want a ride
I do a kegel, I’m kinda wild
Look at my mouth, look at my thighs
This water is wet, come take a dive

Tie me up like I’m surprised
Let’s roleplay, I’ll wear a disguise
I want you to park that big Mack truck right in this little garage
Make me dream, make a stream
Out in public, make a scene
I don’t cook, I don’t clean
But let me tell you, I got this ring (ayy, ayy)”

WAP lyrics

All I did was request some images of their performance of their song, and look what came up: images that I would even have to warn adults about viewing. So what about young people who are just coming of age?

Then you have Gayle King, who referred to Robert’s music as pornographic without addressing some of the biggest culprits in music culture today who she interviewed and never mentioned pornography anywhere, because they are women and victims of course (Gayle King’s view).

You have Cardi B, who has confessed to drugging men to steal from them. But no one cares because she is a woman.

You have Megan Thee Stallion, who has marketed clearly pornographic music to the culture overall, but dares to rap that she can’t respect women who still listen to Robert?

Personally, I can’t respect a woman who raps about WAP!

Then you have Gayle King, the queen of clear hypocrisy, who just in recent days tried to exploit Dolly Parton’s sister in her interview to make it appear as though her sister was implying that Dolly Parton was a socialist like her, when clearly she was not.

Dolly Parton’s carried a gun and was very passionate about it. She was a deeply Christian woman who loved God and lived in Nashville all her life. She supported gay and trans people, yes, but did she ever support their political views anywhere, or was she trying to support the ideals of Christianity, which are based on love?

I’m not saying that she was conservative, either. Who is to know, and who cares? It would completely destroy all her life’s work and her legacy if her sister had, in any way, given Gayle King what she wanted.

It was a clear confidence that only a sister would know, and Gayle King attempted to exploit it at the very time her sister was mourning her death and wanting to share her story and a little about her sister that fans genuinely wanted to know.

But this is typical of Gayle King. She has a pattern that I am seeing.

I think her proximity to someone I no longer hold any respect for, Oprah Winfrey, has made her equally self-aggrandizing and even narcissistic.

I never fully understood how people who claimed to be God-fearing could be completely the opposite in reality, or that people could lose perspective of what is important to God in such a big way. But I’ve seen it in Oprah and in Gayle King: a developing grandiose attitude toward other people, a disconnect from people’s suffering, and a complete lack of empathy and sensitivity, masked by Gayle King’s soft delivery of horrible questions and calculated responses.

You see it again when she interviewed the woman from the Lacey jury pool, who ended up on camera exposing details of the lone juror’s identity. That possibly exposed him to future harassment and issues, not to mention the betrayal of trust in our legal system, where jurors are meant to be protected and are not meant to do interviews or talk about their cases to the media of all people.

I realize that part of a journalist’s job is to get answers that the public hasn’t had and to provide challenging interviews that push the interviewee to share more.

But Gayle King, in my view, has unleashed a style of interviewing that may leave people feeling betrayed, manipulated, and exploited, while she seems to want people to believe that she is a genuinely caring person. When she is clearly not.

And when it comes to her comment about Robert’s music being pornographic, I can’t believe the falsehood in such a comment. The blatant lie and intentional misrepresentation are extraordinary when no one, in all these years, even with the false allegations, has ever claimed Robert’s music to be that.

^{Probably the most suggestive and sexual performance he ever did was with Lady Gaga on SNL, but it was her idea. However, from the way they were dressed to the performance itself, no one of stable mind would call it pornographic. Lady Gaga is known for being explicit, so let’s not forget that or deny her her “female empowerment” rights.}

_{You may find Robert in one or two concert performances of this nature with a woman over his 36-year career. There have been times when Robert has been sexually suggestive in his adult-centered concerts, but nowhere near WAP level or Lady Gaga level. I remember one BDSM-style performance he did at a concert over 30 years ago, but that’s it.}

^{This is factual reality, and it does not support any conclusion that Robert’s music is pornographic or intended for that in any way.}

^{This WAP performance is pornographic, Gayle. The performance below with Robert, his most sexual, is not. Bare in mind it was Lady Gaga’s idea, Robert said in an interview that she challenged him in this way. So bare that in mind and “women’s liberation and empowerment” too of course :/. We have to remember that and have the same expectations of women as we do men, Gayle King.}

^{Robert is incredibly shy and reserved with women he doesn’t know. (I experienced it when we first met). Except when he is in character and performing. So never, ever believe that he was the instigator of this performance. He would never have done it if Lady Gaga hadn’t suggested and encouraged it. So maybe, some women are the real problem, and men like Robert are being blamed for their inappropriate behaviour and ideas.}

When we look at today’s culture of explicit nudity and even pornographic imagery in music and performances, you could only ever call Robert’s music suggestive and sensual in comparison.

I am proud that Robert has never in his life exploited his fans. His female fans have exploited and preyed on him, begging him for experiences, but they now have this new generation believing that they were the victims of him, not the other way around. With the older generation either silent and complicit in the delusion or far removed from who Robert is and was to women from the 90’s to today.

I see Robert’s music, story, and his perspective, as being most similar to King Solomon in the Bible, who wrote extremely sensual and suggestive music and lyrics for scripture, spiritual teachings and for God-fearing people in Song of Songs.

The lyrics were written in the context of a husband and wife, but also of courting and falling in love.

Robert has always promoted his more sensual music as being “baby-making music.” That is a complete contrast to pornography, which is about exploitation, objectification, and even sexual violence. Ideas that I believe artists like Cardi B and Meagan Thee Stallion clearly promote, by pushing public performance, sexual boundaries that have never been pushed before or accepted in culture.

Robert has promoted his music as a cultural pro-creation resource of sorts, for couples and has been proud that he created life three times, his children, from the inspiration of his music. He talks about his children’s creation and birth story all the time in interviews.

That, to me, is in line with the Bible and God’s perspective. It has nothing at all to do with pornography.

And if Gayle King wasn’t an incredible hypocrite on this topic and if she truly was concerned, she would have interviewed the real cultural culprits of this with the same energy when she had the chance: Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion.

But she didn’t, because she is incredibly biased and may even hold a dislike for men in general, with a preference for women in all circumstances, even when they are wrong or displaying what I would consider deeply troubling behavior.

This is my belief, and I stand on that.

Should Robert further emphasize in the future that his music is for married couples, helping to curb the epidemic of promiscuity and immorality, and the abortions that can come from that when people no longer respect life and begin to see babies as the problem rather than confronting their own unchecked sexual appetites?

I think yes, in the future, especially since he is no longer one of the unrepentant. Especially because he is in a committed relationship with a focus on marriage, purity, and family.

I think that may help heal the wounds created by the pornographic era of music and culture that we are in today. It could set a new standard for the culture, especially Black culture, which has, in my view, gone completely out of control with sexuality and sex in general.

Robert’s story is so much like Solomon’s, and his music is too.

I ran a comparison, and you wouldn’t believe how many direct comparisons there are to the lyrics of Song of Songs and Robert’s music. Keeping in mind that Song of Songs was written between the 5th-10th century BCE, it is worth considering what that means.

If God through his Church believe that Song of Songs is inspired enough to be included in biblical texts for generations to learn about courting, love and even lovemaking within the context of marriage and pro-creation, and to inspire Christian believers, then for sure Robert’s music can do the same for today’s culture and in today’s times.

Within the context of marriage, it can speak to the creation and protection of the most sacred element of lovemaking: the creation of new life, so that we can continue on as a human species.

No, it’s not for every age, and Robert has made that clear. How much clearer could he get than writing in his music that women must prove they are of age to even interact with him?

“Show me some ID before we get too deep..”

I remember for years being told by a church—not the Catholic Church, but another church many years ago—that Song of Songs was for married couples and that people should avoid it if they struggled with sexual sins, sexual addictions, or if they were single.

I say that people must take responsibility for themselves, their children, and their teenagers who are coming of age, and make wise decisions about what they listen to and when, particularly when children are around. They should not by any means take their teenagers undercover as adults to adult venues in the hopes of tricking a celebrity into an illegal, non consented interaction.

Because I don’t believe that a man consents in such a situation or can be accused of preying on, being a predator in such a scam, as Robert has repeatedly been accused of.

^{According to the way the law is being abused in Robert’s and other cases, it doesn’t even matter if anything intimate ever actually took place. The engagement with such corrupt individuals, even if innocent and pure e.g the seeking of a music internship for their daughter, is enough to have any man arrested for solicitation of a minor or another charge. Because the woman can later falsely claim something did happen, that never did and people will believe her without any evidence at all.}

Just like Song of Songs is beautiful and purposeful within Holy Matrimony, or when approaching that stage, I believe Robert’s music is for those who understand that ultimately this is Robert’s intention. Inspiring couples to come together, to make love based on love, not exploitation and to create life from that.

He is a hopeless romantic, and he would not want it any other way.

He would rather babies be born in healthy Christian marriages, but he would rather they be born than discarded.

I might be touching on the issue of abortion, but you can’t have a conversation around culturally accepted and promoted immorality and pornography verses unaccepted sensual lovemaking and biblical ideals like making babies —the great hypocrisy of that—without also discussing the hypocrisy of trying to end babies’ lives because the culture is addicted to the promiscuous behaviour that produces those pregnancies.

But please, Gayle and others, remove the plank from your own eye and keep Robert out of your discussions that are laden with hypocrisy and instead focus on the issue Christians are facing today: the attempted eradication of Christian and biblical principles, with some of the biggest culprits being those who claim to be Christians.

And leave Robert’s music to those who have great taste and want to continue making babies to beautiful, sensual music intended for that. For couples in healthy Christian marriages, who enjoy the idea of a modern day King Solomon type.

Am I biased, yes of course I am, but I’m also factual. I stick to facts, over feelings and any political agenda. I don’t have a gender bias and I don’t corrupt evidence or twist reality to fit a political agenda, unlike women like Gayle King, Oprah Winfrey etc. who have made an inexcusable habit of this.

I don’t need to prove that Robert is who I claim him to be. Anybody with wifi, common sense, a logical mind, fairness, integrity and basic intelligence can research anything I state and come to the same conclusions.

He just is THAT man and more!

Apologies, I tried to keep it short but I failed. Maybe next time :).

Take what you need.

Juliet